A lot of “hoopla” has
been floating around the news media lately about the “bubble theory”
of real estate, that is, the theory that the real estate market is
going to burst. In my opinion, this theory has no merit.
First, understand that there are three basic premises that undermine
the discussion of a real estate “bubble”:
- There is no
“national” real estate market
- The real estate
market doesn’t explode or crash
- The market has
limited relevancy to the shrewd investor.
The Real Estate
"Market" is a Compilation of Local Economies
When people speak of the real estate “economy,” they are using
nationally- based statistics. For example, Fortune Magazine
reported recently that since the early 1960’s, average residential
real estate values have never had a down year. This statement is
true, but while these numbers are measurable, they do not reflect
the intricacies of local real estate markets.
The stock market is based on the national, even the world economy.
The real estate market is based on local, and, in many cases,
micro-local economies. For example, California foreclosures are down
7% overall from last year, but up 17% in San Francisco (due, in no
small part, to the fizzle of DOT COM companies). And, within a
particular city that is doing well, there may be certain
neighborhoods doing poorly for a variety of reasons, such as
over-building of new homes. So while statistics, calculations and
economic factors are relevant, so is common sense - take a look
around and see what's really happening. Talk to real estate agents,
investors and lenders in your area for a better picture of what is
going on.
Real Estate
Markets do not “Crash”
We all remember October 19, 1987, known as “Black Monday.” The stock
market lost 22% of its value in one day - what investors call a
“crash.” History points to times which real estate values have taken
22% hits in certain cities and in pockets within cities. However, no
real estate market dropped 22% in one day, one week or even one
month. In fact, the real estate “crash” of the late 1980’s took
several years to bottom out in most markets.
As Money Magazine reported recently, “high prices themselves
don't necessarily indicate a bubble. For that, you also need excess
supply. Factors that inhibit supply -- zoning laws that limit
building, for example -- may prevent a bubble from forming.” And,
according the National Association of Realtors, the supply of homes
is not exceeding demand in most cities. Combine limited supply of
houses, low interest rates that are not going up soon and a
baby-boomer generation in its prime house-buying years, and it is
not likely we will see a collapse any time soon.
Finally, keep in mind that even if a real estate market is reaching
a peak within a particular area, it doesn’t necessary mean it will
necessarily collapse. The fact that real estate values in your city
have climbed at twice the rate of inflation last year and only half
the rate of inflation this year doesn’t mean the bottom is falling
out. And, just because your city’s average real estate values or
home sales went down, doesn’t mean it went down everywhere in the
city. Case in point, Denver, Colorado – excess supply of high-end
homes has driven down values, but the low-end “starter” homes (the
bread and butter of real estate investors) have suffered no loss.
The problem is, people see headlines like "Average Real Estate
Prices Falling" and they panic. Declining values of $1,000,000 homes
skews the average, so you can't pay attention to broad numbers. You
need to look specifically in the price range and location of houses
you are buying.
The Market Has
Limited Relevancy to the Shrewd Investor
If you buy and hold for the long term (15 + years), you aren't
likely to lose. Real estate values generally go up in the long run,
with few exceptions. The same is probably true of the stock market
in the long run, but there's one problem: there's no guarantee any
company you invest in will be in business in 15 years - not even
Xerox, IBM or AOL!
If you buy and flip properties quickly, the market appreciation or
decline is not all that relevant to your profit. I had this
discussion when I appeared CNBC recently; if the local real estate
market is "hot" you can sell a property quickly, but you can't buy
it as cheap. If the local real estate market is weak, you can steal
properties, but you have to account for a longer hold period when
you resell. It is relevant to know where your market is CURRENTLY
going (up or down), but don't worry so much about the "bubble"
bursting - real estate markets don't collapse (or explode) in 3 to 6
months.
On the other hand,
if you are buying properties with negative cash flow with the
expectation of the values increasing over 2-3 years, shame on you!
What if the values decrease? What's your backup plan? Can you rent
it for break-even cash flow? Can you sustain negative cash flow
until the market rebounds? If so, then don't sweat it - you'll also
pick up a whole bunch more properties at the bottom of the real
estate cycle. If not, then you are a “speculator,” not an investor,
and you are at the whim of factors beyond your control. Such
activity is very risky, to say the least.
The bottom line is,
the real estate market may go up, and then again, it may go down. So
what? Don't bank on appreciation, buy properties below market, and
have a "plan B" if it doesn't work out. Do this, and the you will
see that the "bubble theory" is full of hot air.
|